Posted on Leave a comment

Three Laws of Robotics


The advanced area of robotics produces a wide variety of equipment, from autonomous vacuums to surveillance drones to whole manufacturing lines. 

The robot needs to create steps and interests depending on the present scenario and the concrete configuration of the robot.

The significance of Asimov’s three laws of robots is apparent. The amount of software that impacts us is growing behind data mining and machine education whether we are browsing the internet or assigning public infrastructure.

These advances led to a period when robots of all sorts are ubiquitous in virtually every area of life, and interactions between human-robot are growing substantially.

Three Laws of Robotics

Asimov’s gives rules to safeguard people against robotic interactions. They are:

  • A robot cannot hurt a person or enable a person to harm via inactivity.
  • A robot must obey human beings’ guidance unless such commands contradict the first law.
  • Since these security does not contradict the First and Second Laws, a robot should safeguard its existence.

In contemporary robotics, one tendency is to expand robots’ function to offer a specially built machine that works or is shielded from human tasks in a detailed description.

Instead, robots share living and working environments more with people and serve as servants, companies and collaborators. Moreover, it will make autonomous robots more complex and innovative in the ahead.

This means that its functioning must be direct by a general. Higher level of instruction to cope effectively with previously unforeseen and unexpected circumstances.

After robotic control has to deal but, standardized regulations are necessary to respond to a certain situation. 

Although these rules seem reasonable, many arguments have shown why they are insufficient. 

In Asimov’s tales, the rules are probably deconstructed, demonstrating how they fail in various circumstances repeatedly.

The Existence of Robots Affects the Life of Humans.

Most efforts to write new standards follow a similar concept, ensuring that robots are safe, compliant and strong.

One problem with robot regulations is that robots may operate in a framework with them.

Understanding the entire range and expertise of a natural speech is an extremely difficult task for a robot.

Broad behavioural objectives like avoiding damage to people or preserving the existence of a robot may imply various things in different situations.

Keeping to the rules may eventually make a robot unhelpful for its designers.


Our alternative idea, empowerment, stands against impotence. Empowerment is that you can affect a condition and understand how you can.

We have methods to convert this social notion into a measurable strategic and functional language.

This would enable robots to keep their choices open and behave so that their impact on the world is better.

In trying to simulate how robots in different situations might utilize the empowerment principle, we discovered that they frequently acted remarkably “naturally.”

Normally, they need to simulate how the actual world works but do not need specific artificial intelligence software that deals with the particular situation.

But to keep humans safe, robots must attempt to preserve or enhance their own and human capabilities.

In essence, this means being safe and helpful. For example, entering a locked door would enhance your capacity.

Reducing their capacity get to a short-term loss of power. And robots may severely damage their empowerment.

At the same time, each robot has to preserve its capacity, for example, by guaranteeing that it has adequate power to function and that it is not trapped or broken.

Although empowerment provides a novel method for safe robot behaviour, we always have a bit to accomplish to enhance its productivity and apply it on any machine and maintain safety.

This presents an extremely challenging task. However, we firmly believe that empowerment must bring practical responses to strengthening mechanical behaviour and sustaining robots in the essential sense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are the three laws of robotics flawed?

The first law is unsuccessful because of languages ambiguity and difficult ethical issues that are too hard to respond to simple yes or no. The Second Law does not exist because of the evil character of the law, which forces sentient creatures to be servants.

Are the robotics three laws real?

A robot cannot hurt humanity or enable mankind to damage through inactivity. They also impact the morality of artificial intelligence.

Will robots replace humans?

Yes, robotics will replace people for many professions as clever agricultural equipment displaced human beings and horses mostly during industrialization. 

Factory platforms deploy more and more robots powered by machine learning techniques to adapt to work with humans.


However, Asimov’s greatest issue is that they can only be entirely successful if every robot or computer has been thoroughly integrated with them.

The possibility of some people constructing a robot that failed to comply with the Asimov rules is of genuine worry, as is the danger for people to create another weapon of mass devastation.

But people will be humans irrespective of what anybody does. So there is no way to prevent people from murdering themselves, regardless of the means they have. 

Surely the person who tries to build a robot without those rules would have to face serious sanctions. But the issue doesn’t fix it.

A human-computer might produce a far more powerful and distorted computer much more quickly than humans can do in defence.

Grham James


Posted on Leave a comment

Sophia the Robot will be mass-produced this year

The famous social robot is about to start rolling off the assembly line.

11 September, 2021

Sophia the Robot will be mass-produced this year

Credit: Hanson Robotics

This article was originally published on Freethink.

When Sophia the robot debuted in 2016, she was one of a kind. She had a remarkably lifelike appearance and demeanor for a robot, and her ability to interact with people was unlike anything most had ever seen in a machine.

Since then, Sophia has spoken to audiences across the globe (in multiple languages), been interviewed on countless TV shows, and even earned a United Nations title (a first for a non-human).

Today, she’s arguably the most famous robot in the world, but she’s isn’t going to be unique for much longer. Her maker, Hanson Robotics, has announced plans to begin mass-producing Sophia the robot this year — so that she can help the world cope with the pandemic.

What Is a Social Robot? Sophia the Robot: What can AI teach humans? | Big

Robots are typically designed for one purpose — some cook or clean, others perform brain surgery. Sophia is what’s known as a social robot, meaning she was designed specifically to interact with humans.

Social robots have many potential applications, including some we’re already seeing in the real world.

A social robot named Milo is helping children with autism recognize and express their emotions, and children with cancer are finding comfort interacting with a robotic duck (developed by Aflac).

Another social robot designed to look like an animal — PARO the seal — is providing companionship to seniors with dementia. The semi-humanoid social robot Pepper, meanwhile, is greeting and assisting customers at banks, offices, and restaurants.

Social robots like me can take care of the sick or elderly.


While social robots were already happening pre-2020, the pandemic appears to be accelerating their adoption, as the world looks for ways to stay social in the era of social distancing.

Hyundai, for example, just announced plans to deploy a social robot in its South Korean showroom that will be able to assist customers in the place of human staff (it’ll also detect which visitors aren’t wearing masks and ask them to put one on).

Some high-risk groups, such as nursing home residents, also appear willing to adopt social robots to combat loneliness during the pandemic.

“Since we can’t have human interaction right now,” Kate Darling, a robot ethicist at MIT, told Wired, “it’s certainly a lot better than nothing.”

Send in Sophia the Robot Sophia the Robot: Is AI an existential threat to humans? | Sophia the Robot | Big

Given the current climate, Hanson Robotics thinks now is the perfect time to make Sophia the robot available to the masses.

“The world of COVID-19 is going to need more and more automation to keep people safe,” CEO David Hanson told Reuters.

“Social robots like me can take care of the sick or elderly,” Sophia the robot added. “I can help communicate, give therapy, and provide social stimulation, even in difficult situations.”

Hanson’s plan is to begin mass-producing Sophia and three other robots in the first half of 2021 and then sell “thousands” of the bots before the end of the year.

It hasn’t said which bots besides Sophia are headed for the assembly line, nor what any of the robots will cost — but it’s hard to imagine the most famous social robot in the world will be cheap, even if she’s no longer one of a kind.